Showing posts with label The Walking Dead. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Walking Dead. Show all posts

Tuesday, 20 January 2015

Fangirling

'Fangirling' wasn't a word back when every available flat surface or my bedroom was covered in posters (yes, even the ceiling - until a particularly large one fell down on me in the middle of the night, then it was only every available flat vertical surface), but I think that fits the definition. The primary objects of my teenage desires tended to be actors or musicians with any combination of shaggy hair/ sexy eyes (usually blue)/ fuzzy chin/ muscular arms/ tattoos and they remain so to this day.


Whenever I come across an actor I like (irrespective of whether I have a crush on them) I like to view their back catalogue. Thanks to the Internet, you can have an actor's complete filmography in front of you in a matter of seconds and, thanks to streaming services like Netflix, be watching something from it in under a minute. As someone who tends to remember faces but is terrible with names it's a godsend - no more "where have I seen him before?" and having to trawl through my entire video library before eventually finding the one he'd been in like I had to as a teenager. This has, unfortunately, resulted in me watching some fucking awful films. It's a good job I have a fondness for bad horror films (1) because an alarmingly high number of these films have belonged to the horror genre - it seems a lot of actors start out in horror (2). It has also mean I've happened across some really good films I might not otherwise have watched were it not for the fact the actor I like is featured in them - sometimes only very briefly (3).


I've had a crush on David Tennant since I was fifteen, when he played Campbell in Takin' Over the Asylum, although I didn't watch much of the television he did after that until he appeared in the first episode of the 2000 remake of Randall and Hopkirk (Deceased) that starred Vic Reeves and Bob Mortimer. He then dropped off my radar again until five years later, when I have a very clear memory of seeing a trailer for Casanova and, wide-eyed, heart a-flutter, exclaiming "Campbell!" at the television and, quite literally, swooning. It wasn't long after this that he became the ninth actor to play The Doctor.

Doctor Who was one of my favourite television programmes as a child. When I started watching it, the Doctor was played by Tom Baker but, perhaps due to my tender age at the time, the one I remember most vividly is Sylvester McCoy - I was just ten when the series ended. It was a huge part of my childhood, forming the basis for many a lively conversation on the bus to the pool for swimming lessons (it aired the night before) and playground game. It also terrified me - I have a very clear recollection of being too scared to walk alone down our long, narrow hallway so I could go upstairs to use the loo after watching an episode of the 1987 story 'Paradise Towers', about a futuristic tower block with corridors patrolled by robotic killing machines called 'Cleaners' (4). When the BBC first announced they were making a new series, I instantly thought of that awful 1996 film that starred Paul McGann, which I'd hated because it was far too slick and polished - my Doctor Who was all about the wobbly sets, bad guys in rubber suits and bad visual effects. I was very wary. But I watched it anyway - I don't feel qualified to criticise things I haven't seen. And I thought it was fucking awesome. And then it was announced that David Tennant would be taking over as the Ninth Doctor.

David was an amazing Doctor. He was a huge fan of Doctor Who when he was growing up and it's so obvious from his performance that he thoroughly enjoyed making it. He brought such incredible energy and enthusiasm to the role and was simply a joy to watch. I was devastated when he left and I really couldn't see how that "funny-looking kid" (for that's what I called him then) Matt Smith would ever be able to fill his Converse. Some of my female friends stopped watching it. The doubts I had about Matt proved to be completely wrong. He was brilliant. Still funny-looking in my eyes but he made the role his own and I loved his Doctor to bit. One of my female friends didn't think he was funny-looking, she thought his was flippin' gorgeous. When Peter Capaldi was named as his replacement I remember her complaining that the Doctor shouldn't be played by "some old ugly bloke!" Women like her give fangirls a bad name - she doesn't watch Doctor Who any more since Matt left. Me? I was just as excited about this casting as I was about David Tennant's. Mainly because of this:


There's something about these Doctor Who fanboys that makes them excellent Doctors.


When I told my husband I'd been watching The Walking Dead he recalled how much I'd hated before. I really can't explain why I disliked it so much the first time I watched it. It completely baffles me, given just how much I love it now (5). Second time around it hooked me right from the start. It's so raw and visceral, action-packed, exciting edge-of-your-seat stuff and the characters are so well written and portrayed - you really do care about what happens to them so, when it's something bad, it's emotionally affecting too. Oh and...it isn't exactly short on eye candy (6).

Norman Reedus plays Daryl Dixon in The Walking Dead. Daryl doesn't appear in the first episode at all and Reedus is only a supporting cast member throughout the first season (7). Season One Daryl isn't particularly likable. He's stubborn, selfish, immature and quick-tempered. During Season Two he is angry, emotionally closed and isolates himself from the others. Although he shows kindness towards Carol when her daughter first disappears, he rebuffs her efforts to bring him back to the group later on and, although he demonstrates loyalty to the group, he shows he is willing to take extreme, violent measures to protect them. In Season Three he is much calmer and has reintegrated with the rest of the group, but his loyalties are tested with the unexpected return of his brother. The Season Three episode 'Home' marks a significant turning point for Daryl, and it is the events of this episode that saw him become my favourite character. It was also the point at which I realised I had a massive crush on Norman Reedus. It was that scene on the bridge that did it, and what follows immediately after - Daryl saves a Mexican family with a baby by taking out a bunch of walkers almost single-handedly (fangirling - oh my God does he look hot in that sequence!), then he stands up to his brother for the first time in his life before being forced to reveal some truly heartbreaking information about his past:

During an argument with his brother, Daryl's shirt is ripped, revealing scars on his back from the abuse he suffered (8) at the hands of their father. This also reveals a large tattoo on his right shoulder. I Googled to see whether it was real or just make-up for the character: it's real, he has several. So... referring back to the beginning of this post we have: shaggy hair - check, sexy eyes - check, fuzzy chin - check, muscular arms - check, and tattoos - check. Hence my massive crush on Norman Reedus. I am now thirty-six years old though, and my husband won't let me cover our bedroom walls with posters - spoilsport (9). So I have this on my desk instead.

It's not just me. When I mentioned this to one of my co-workers she got quite excited, started breathing heavily and said, and I quote, "Daryl... I'm in love!" It does seem that Daryl's fans are a rather, ahem, passionate bunch...


"If Daryl dies, we riot" is their catchphrase, apparently. Therefore I don't feel I can class myself as one of "Dixon's Vixens". Because I know that if/ when that happens; I will just bawl my fucking eyes out. I will probably swear at the TV. I will definitely tweet that I am bawling my fucking eyes out and swearing at the TV... lol. But I'll carry on watching next episode or next Season, as I have carried on watching Doctor Who, and enjoy watching him do other stuff.

I am a little embarrassed that I deliberately sought out the films Norman had worked on before The Walking Dead that I had already seen and only half-remembered him from. I even put myself through Pandorum (2009) again - only up until his character's death, which happens pretty early on, because by then I'd remembered just how fucking bad that film is (10). My husband instantly recognised Norman as 'Scud' from Blade II (2002). Watching that one back was funny because it quickly dawned on me that I had rather fancied him at the time... how did I seemingly forget this? And why did I not notice it before then? That's probably something I can't answer, I'm just sorry I didn't. I might have had more chance of catching him in some of the more obscure things he's done that aren't so easy to come by.

When I watch a film I've already seen I like to read the trivia and goofs sections on the IMDb. In the trivia section for Gossip (2000) it says that Norman Reedus created his artist character's artwork himself. That's interesting. I have a tendency to browse the Internet in a 'Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon' sort of way, this piece of trivia led me to Norman's IMDb profile, then to his Wikipedia page, then to his official website, then to his Twitter (obviously, I followed), which led me to his Instagram. I don't follow people on Instagram unless I like the pictures they post. I really like his. His feed is a fascinating mix of incredibly beautiful scenic shots, selfies, cat-ography, behind-the-scenes snaps from the set of the The Walking Dead, photos of his son (11), fan art and random pictures of some seriously. weird. shit. Weird shit his fans have sent to him. He seems to get sent a lot of weird shit. He's only got himself to blame: It seems Norman likes collecting souvenirs from the projects he's worked on and the places he's visited and his taste in souvenirs is... unusual. I mean, what could be more unusual than keeping a bag full of your co-star's beard clippings in your fridge (12)? Although I get the distinct impression from his social media that he is sometimes embarrassed and overwhelmed by the level of attention he receives, he is thankful and humble and there are times when he clearly revels in it and shamelessly baits his fangirls. Last year, Norman published a book of some of the fan art he's received and called it 'thanksforalltheniceness'. He sent signed copies to the fans whose artwork was featured. Sweet, right? But he was also asked in an interview "How do you fight off all the groupies?" and responded, "I try not to." Shameless fangirl baiting. He also posted this picture on his Instagram. There is no way he did not notice. There was also this. Utterly shameless fangirl baiting. I love it. And I'm happy to take the bait ;)




Footnotes:

(1) There are exceptions. Like Messengers 2: The Scarecrow (2009), which is just a terrible, terrible film.

(2) http://bloody-disgusting.com/editorials/3328512/11-famous-actors-got-start-horror/

(3) The Notorious Bettie Page (2005), Cadillac Records (2008), Pawn Shop Chronicles (2013), and Stretch (2014) all feature Norman Reedus in roles of increasing brevity, the latter consisting of a tiny cameo as "himself". I confess I only watched them because they came up when I searched for him on my streaming service (sadly, so did Messengers 2...) but it turned out there were many more reasons for me to enjoy them, and I enjoyed them all immensely.

(4) I know. But, at the time, they were fucking terrifying:




(5) I can only assume I wasn't thinking straight at the time - I was suffering with a horrible combination of post-traumatic stress and post-natal depression following the birth of my son.

(6) Don't misinterpret this statement. Though I can appreciate the visual appeal of most of the male case members, Norman Reedus is the only one who really does it for me.

(7) He has gone from being a supporting cast member to second billed in the opening credits. Now that's an exponential increase in popularity!

(8) With this shocking revelation, Daryl suddenly made sense to me. A lot of his personality traits - even the negative ones - are ones I recognise in myself. I know a lot of them come from having being abused as a child myself. Like Daryl, my abuser was someone who should have been responsible for my care (although not a relative), and it was never dealt with at the time. It's something I've never really tried to deal with since, something I hid - I suppose in a way I'm lucky that, unlike Daryl, I bear no physical scars. When I realised what was being revealed in that scene it brought it all back to me. It sounds corny, but watching Daryl start to come to terms with his past abuse has helped me start to come to terms with what happened to me. This probably explains why I feel such a strong connection to this particular character, and why I bawl like a frightened child whenever I see Daryl cry.

(9) I even offered to let him put up posters of the famous ladies he likes on his wall - and he's got more wall space that I have given mine has a fucking great window in it - and he still refused. He did buy me a poster of David Tennant as the Doctor which I hung on the door to the cupboard under the stairs though (the only reason it's not there any more is because it kept falling down - fucking Blu Tack - and got ripped) so there's hope yet.

(10) See also, Mimic (1997), although I did at least manage to make it to the end of that one and, to be fair, it was better than I had remembered. But still not great.

(11) I've never seen a picture of Norman Reedus as a child but the pictures he's shared of his son make me think that if he ever did I would probably think that he, like Adele, has actually cloned himself. Mind you, people look at my son and say it looks like I've cloned myself....

(12) I know famous people have some ridiculous stuff written about them, and you would be forgiven for thinking this is one of those things, because it's so weird, but it's trueI'm sitting here writing that that's weird but I also have a bag of someone else's hair - the clippings from my son's first haircut. I know a lot of parents keep a lock of their child's hair from their first haircut but not all of the hair like I have. And definitely not in a bag. I don't keep it in the fridge though....

Friday, 16 January 2015

Don't Read - Spoilers Inside!*

*Unless you are fully up-to-date with The Walking Dead on TV.

This is a post in which I try to explain why I love The Walking Dead so much, and why I agonised for such a long time over whether to read the comic book its based on.

Let me start by saying I love horror films. Even the really bad, horribly cliched, terribly acted ones. It's my favourite film genre. If a film has vampires, zombies or a dozen increasingly more gory death scenes, chances are I'm going to like it. I don't tend to be scared by horror films; I find the odd one unsettling, some might make me feel a bit queasy and there's the odd one that gets me with a good jump scare (1). I've been watching horror films from quite a young age, thanks to my mother allowing me to watch such things as Alien (1979) when they were shown on TV. One of the reasons that film has never really scared me is because I'd already seen Spaceballs (1987) (2). It was watching horror films that got me interested in special effects, in particular, special effects make-up. My mum bought me a children's encyclopedia that came as a part-work and one entry was all about this stuff. It described how the special effects in The Exorcist (1973) had been done and it sounded like incredible stuff. Due to the 1984 Video Recordings Act, I didn't actually get to see them until the film was re-released in cinemas in 1998....

One of my favourite 'zombie' films is 28 Days Later. The opening scenes are simply incredible: The film's protagonist, Jim, wakes up from a coma in a London hospital. He finds the place - and the city - completely deserted, and it's evident something has gone very, very wrong. He stumbles across and is attacked by a group of what appear to be zombies - ones that can run very fucking fast - but is rescued. His rescuers explain to a confused Jim what's happened whilst he was in his coma, and that the group were "infected" with a virus called "Rage".

When I sat down to watch the pilot episode of The Walking Dead back in 2010, I knew very little about it other than it was about zombies. I expected I'd like it just for that reason though. I didn't get very far in. Rick wakes up from a coma - just like Jim, in a hospital - just like Jim, starts stumbling around - just like Jim, and find the world has apparently gone to shit - just like Jim. I turned that rip-off off. When Sophia's fate was revealed in Season Two, I remember my friends who have been fans of The Walking Dead since the beginning, were surprised to learn that I wasn't watching it. I never planned to, based on how I'd felt watching that pilot episode. Things changed.


Towards the end of last year, we got TiVo. Home alone and bored one day, with nothing I felt like watching showing on any channel I decided to look for something to watch 'On Demand'. When I brought up the menu the suggestion in the bottom left-hand corner was The Walking Dead. This was completely random, because the box was brand new - we hadn't given anything the 'thumbs up' yet so it wasn't based on what we liked to watch. I was vaguely aware that the fifth series was due to start soon, and given there were only four to catch up on if I liked it this time, I figured I'd give it another go. Whilst the similarity of those opening scenes in the pilot episode to those of 28 Days Later still struck me, for some inexplicable reason, it didn't anger me the way it had before; I saw it as an homage. I kept watching. By the end of that pilot episode I was hooked, and I just had to find out what was going to happen next.

When I say "I was hooked," I mean I was literally glued to the screen - I couldn't take my eyes off it. Usually when I'm watching TV I've got one eye on something else - Twitter, Candy Crush, a book or magazine... this blog. With The Walking Dead, I couldn't bring myself to look away. I didn't want to. I still don't. It's the only TV programme I've ever watched that has consistently managed to keep my undivided attention. Even now I'm watching old episodes back with my husband so he can get caught up, I find it difficult to focus on anything else. Since I've been watching Season Five, I've had to deal with ad-breaks, which seem to occur far too frequently and at the most inconvenient moments - that's when I do my live-tweeting of the show.


I didn't realise The Walking Dead was based on a comic book at first. Ordinarily, I like to read the book before I watch something because, if I do it the other way around, I tend to find that not only do I not enjoy the book but I end up liking the film a little less. This happened with Jackie Brown, The Shining and LA Confidential, although the latter still remains one of my all-time favourite non-horror films. A notable exception to this is Sin City. Seeing that film prompted me to read the graphic novel and I absolutely fell in love with it. It was obvious the book had been used as a ready-made storyboard and I think the way every single frame had been so faithfully recreated for the film is what made me adore them both. 

I was wary about reading The Walking Dead comic book because I knew some significant changes had been made and I was concerned this might affect my enjoyment of them both - I didn't want to end up hating a programme I loved. So I decided I wouldn't read it.

Two of the things I like the most about The Walking Dead are Greg Nicotero's incredible special effects make-up and the character Daryl Dixon. He doesn't appear in the comics. I read that Norman Reedus originally auditioned for the part of Merle and didn't get it, but they liked him that much they actually wrote the character of Daryl for him. That's awesome - but the absence of my favourite character was another thing that put me off reading the comic book.

I didn't actually like Daryl to begin with - I felt he acted like a petulant child in the first series, like a grumpy teenager in the second. He started to change towards the end of Season Two and, by the mid-way point of Season Three, he'd matured a lot and I started to like him a lot more. The turning point was when it was revealed he had been a victim of child abuse - so was I. This aspect of Daryl's past is something he'd never come to terms with, and it's only in Season Five that it looks like he's finally ready to confront it. This is something I identify with, having never really come to terms with my own abuse, and watching him go through it has been cathartic. I do feel a very strong connection to the character. It could be this, or it could be something about Norman Reedus' face, or just because it's somehow more upsetting to see a man cry, but I always burst into tears every time Daryl cries!


I came across an article online which was asking fans of The Walking Dead who they thought would make the best new villain following the demise of The Governor. There seemed to be a lot of comments from people who thought it should be Negan, and a lot saying it shouldn't because they wouldn't be able to do the character justice on TV. Because I had decided I wouldn't ever read the comic book, and because I knew that anything I read that was a potential spoiler wasn't necessarily one due to the fact some huge changes had already been made (3), and especially given there were major characters in the TV programme that weren't in the comic book, I decided to read up on Negan: he's a foul-mouthed sociopath who, in the comics, beats Glen to death with a baseball bat wrapped in barbed wire whilst cracking jokes. Hmm... maybe it's not possible to bring him to life on TV! A trivia note at the end of the article I read noted that the character was based on a particular actor but that Robert Kirkman refused to say who in case that actor wasn't able to play him if they ever did include him in the show. I thought of Henry Rollins for some reason - I'm assuming it's because of how bad-ass he was in Wrong Turn 2 (2007), and because some of the artwork I'd seen of the character reminded me vaguely of him.

Season Five contains some of the most shocking violence I've ever seen on TV. The opening episode, 'No Sanctuary', contains some horrifying, graphic scenes reminiscent of Hostel (2005). Episode two, 'Strangers', ends with one of the most disturbing scenes I've ever seen on television. The third episode, 'Four Walls and a Roof' includes an execution so shocking and violent it makes some horror films look tame! Bringing Negan in didn't seem quite so impossible. I started contemplating reading the comic book.

I thought about other adaptations I've seen where I loved both book and film equally. Perhaps the best example is The Shawshank Redemption (1994). The Stephen King novella upon which it is based is one of the best things I've ever read. I was hugely excited about seeing the film. There are some fairly significant differences between book and film, but they didn't bother me whilst I was watching it at all - I found it simply captivating. Even the ending is slightly different - and I didn't care. There's a fade to black right at the point where the book ends and I'd already started to get up to leave, but that scene continues and I ended up sitting back down again, in floods of tears: it was beautiful. The Shawshank Redemption was adapted for the screen by Frank Darabont... who is responsible for developing The Walking Dead for television.

Another book to film adaptation where I like both versions equally is Harry Potter. What's notable about this series is how heavily involved JK Rowling was with the process. The same could be said about the writer of The Walking Dead: Robert Kirkman acts as Executive Producer and has written several episodes.

When I re-read the Negan article recently, I noticed the trivia at the end has been updated to note that Charlie Adlard has confirmed the character is based on Henry Rollins. I'm maybe reading too much into it, but I think that either means he doesn't want to or can't do it, or that the producers have decided they can't make the character work on screen, or it means he's going to play Negan when they introduce his character to the show... that latter possibility got me a little bit excited. It made me want to know more about Negan. It made me want to read about Negan.

I've read that the producers of The Walking Dead have said the comic book has provided them with enough material for twelve seasons and, unlike the writers of Lost, I do get the sense they know exactly where they're going with it. Nothing feels like 'filler' for me - even the slower-paced episodes that focus more on character development keep me just as much on the edge of my seat as the relentless, action-packed ones do. Something tells me Robert Kirkman won't let them mess with his baby too much - he's said he's got an ending in mind, but that it will take time to get there. JK Rowling came up with the idea for Harry Potter in 1990 and said the final chapter of the final book was written that same year. When the first film adaptation was made she hadn't yet written the final books, but her involvement was such to ensure both series ended up in the same place.

I'd already leafed through a couple of issues of The Walking Dead in the comic book shop - yes, I was that person [insert "ashamed" emoji here], I'd seen the incredibly detailed, beautiful artwork and spotted a few frames that had evidently been lifted straight from the page and recreated on the screen, just as they had been in Sin City, but it was the possibility of Negan actually happening that really clinched it for me - what is it about bad guys?

I am still slightly wary of spoilers, but I try to remember how I felt when I was watching The Shawshank Redemption. I completely understood why Darabont had made the changes he had to the book; I hope to understand why The Walking Dead comic book has been changed for its adaptation for television. I will be avoiding Twitter on Sunday nights and throughout Monday as of February though - I don't want to have to go through crap like #RIPBeth again before I've seen the latest episode!

I thought I'd have to start saving up to buy The Walking Dead, but then we rearranged the furniture in the living room:

My birthday is three days after Christmas so people tend to send my birthday cards at the same time they send the Christmas cards and presents. I'd put the cards on a shelf, on top of some DVDs, and had forgotten they were there. We found them when we were moving the shelf. Some contained money from family members who had had no idea what to buy me - I spent it on the first few volumes of the comics. I'm really enjoying them. I'm spotting little things that I suspect were put into the show specifically to keep fans of the comic book happy. Seeing them in the comic book having seen them in the show makes me happy. And I don't miss Daryl.


I'm try not to be too concerned about seeing flaws in the TV version of The Walking Dead the further I get reading the comic book, because of this:

When the comedian Bill Hicks died in 1994, several of his contemporaries and people who knew him took part in a documentary about him entitled 'Just A Ride'. One of those featured was another 'Southern' comedian, Brett Butler. Something she said about Bill has always stuck with me. I'm probably paraphrasing, but she was talking about him being criticised for some of the things he said about the South and she said it didn't mean he didn't love the South. She said, "whenever you love something that much, you see all of its flaws, ten fold." I think that's true - you spend a lot of time focusing on the things you love and when you focus on something its flaws are magnified. It doesn't necessarily change the way you feel about it. I love The Walking Dead. Perhaps that explains why I also love this:






Footnotes:

(1) The Descent (2005) actually made me scream out loud. First time ever that had happened.

(2) http://youtu.be/aVZUVeMtYXc

(3) Sophia is one of the longest-surviving characters in the comic book; she dies part-way through Season Two.




This post was published in its original form on 16/01/2015. I chose to edit it because, well... I thought it was shit. Note to self: write, read, re-write, then publish blog post!